Quick Answer
For search, voice, and "just tell me what to do".
This article explores why most ai strategies fail after 18 months, focusing on tool churn and dependency collapse.
Key Takeaways:
- Tool churn and dependency collapse
- Strategy decay vs strategy durability
- Designing systems that survive model changes
In-Depth Analysis
The Core Concept
Tool churn and dependency collapse
At its heart, Why Most AI Strategies Fail After 18 Months is about recognizing where value truly lies in an automated world. It asks us to look beyond immediate efficiency and consider the second-order effects of our technological choices.
Why This Matters
In the rush to adopt new tools, we often overlook the subtle shifts in power and responsibility. This article argues for a more deliberate approach—one where human judgment retains the final vote.
Key Dynamics
To understand this fully, we must consider several factors:
- Tool churn and dependency collapse: This is a critical lever for maintaining strategic advantage and ethical alignment.
- Strategy decay vs strategy durability: This is a critical lever for maintaining strategic advantage and ethical alignment.
- Designing systems that survive model changes: This is a critical lever for maintaining strategic advantage and ethical alignment.
Moving Forward
By integrating these insights, leaders can build systems that are not just faster, but more robust and meaningful.
Related Reading
Next: browse the hub or explore AI Operations.