News Analysis: Why a Small Nation Like Belgium Is Having a Major Virus Outbreak

News Analysis: Why a Small Nation Like Belgium Is Having a Major Virus Outbreak

This post was originally published on this site

News Analysis

Belgium, based on its population of 11 million and geographical size of 30,500 square kilometers, is considered a small country among the 195 sovereign nations in the world.

But looking at its current number of deaths and confirmed infections due to the CCP virus, Belgium has among the world’s highest death rates.

As of April 23, the number of confirmed infections in Belgium announced was 42,797; the number of deaths was 6,490—making the death rate roughly 15 percent. This places Belgium’s mortality rate above hard-hit regions like the United States, Spain, Italy, and the United Kingdom.

Why is Belgium experiencing such a severe situation?

The Epoch Times editorial article, “Where Ties With Communist China Are Close, the Coronavirus Follows,” suggests that “the heaviest-hit regions outside China all share a common thread: close or lucrative relations with the communist regime in Beijing.”

The situation in Belgium is no exception. In fact, Belgium has had close ties with the Chinese Communist regime, from the royal family to the government, for many years.

Two of Belgium’s most important ports have embraced Beijing’s Belt and Road initiative (BRI, also known as One Belt, One Road), an ambitious project to build geopolitical influence by financing infrastructure projects throughout parts of Europe, Africa, and central and south Asia.

Belgium’s geographical location is strategically advantageous. It faces the Netherlands in the north, France in the south, Luxembourg and Germany in the east, and the North Sea in the west.

Belgium’s largest port of Antwerp is close to the production and consumption center of Europe. Such a logistics hub was coveted by Beijing.

In July 2015, the Port of Antwerp set up a “Belt and Road” task force, signing a deal with Chinese companies to build a “China-Europe-Africa International Trade and Logistics Center.”

The port authority of Antwerp then signed “twinning port” agreements or memorandums of understanding with ports in Shanghai, Shenzhen, Ningbo, Tianjin, Qingdao, and Dalian.

In May 2018, the first silk road train from a Chinese port in Tangshan arrived in Antwerp as part of a direct railway link between the two countries.

Meanwhile, the port training center at Antwerp has trained roughly 3,800 Chinese maritime experts.

The port of Zeebrugge, on the northern coast of Belgium, is the second most important commercial port in Belgium. It is close to Britain across the strait. Today, there are still ferry connections between Zeebrugge and the British ports of Hull and Dover.

As part of the Belt and Road project, China’s state-owned shipping firm Cosco also signed an agreement in November 2017 to acquire controlling stakes in the container terminal at Zeebrugge.

However, Kris Peeters, then-Deputy Prime Minister of Belgium, said at the signing ceremony on January 2018 that the agreement “contributes to strengthening Belgian-Chinese trade and the international position of the Port of Zeebrugge.”

Cooperation Between Chinese Investment and European Technology

The car factory Volvo Car Gent, located in the port district of Ghent in western Belgium, covers an area of more than 490,000 square meters. The largest Belgian car manufacturer was founded in 1965, and it was the first European Volvo plant outside Sweden. Ford Motor bought Volvo in 2009 for $6.45 billion. But Ford was in trouble during the global financial crisis in 2008, and began divesting assets. In 2010, Ford sold Volvo to China’s Geely Group for $1.8 billion, which became the first Chinese company to own a multinational premium car brand.

In April 2014, Chinese Communist Party leader Xi Jinping visited the Volvo factory in Ghent, accompanied by King Philippe Léopold Louis Marie of Belgium. Xi and the Belgian king jointly unveiled the company’s 300,000th car exported to China.

With the increasing popularity of Volvo in the Chinese market, the brand’s car output continues to reach new highs, and the Volvo car plant has gradually become the fulcrum for the global layout of Geely.

Geely received approval from the Chinese government to build a new Volvo plant in Daqing, in China’s Heilongjiang province in 2011. Engineers from the Ghent factory brought over their technical expertise to ensure that the new plant would have the same quality and competitiveness as other plants around the world.

The vice-governor of Heilongjiang, Hao Huilong, said, “The Daqing plant is showing positive growth momentum thanks to cutting-edge automotive production technology from Volvo.”

In May 2017, the then Belgian Deputy Prime Minister, Kris Peeters, came to China to attend the “Belt and Road” International Cooperation Summit Forum. During the visit, he made a special trip to Daqing to witness the launch of the trial operation of Volvo’s S90 luxury sedan, which was being moved to the Ghent factory through the “Overland Silk Road” Central European special train.

On May 30, a batch of Volvo S90 cars produced in Daqing was transported to the port of Zeebrugge in Belgium via the Asia-Europe Railway and transferred to Ghent. Soon after, a large number of new luxury Volvo cars that were made in China were distributed to the European market from the central auto plant in Ghent.

In June 2017, Chinese Premier Li Keqiang, accompanied by then-Prime Minister Charles Michel, visited the Geely Volvo Innovation Achievement Exhibition. The two leaders saw the Volvo S90 model produced in the Daqing plant boarding the China-Europe train to Belgium. The smooth relations between the leaders of both countries ensured that there were no obstacles in selling China-made Volvo cars to European countries.
In July 2019, the first batch of Volvo’s XC60 model was shipped to Ghent from the Chengdu plant in China—the third Volvo plant in the country.

Geely spent $1.8 billion to buy Volvo. Can it compete in the targeted European market? Can they afford the world’s most cutting-edge automotive production technology that is continuously upgraded? This was still very uncertain at the time. But now it seems that China already has what it wants. At the same time, the 100 percent Chinese-owned Swedish car brand has fully demonstrated the “Made in China” high-quality products in Europe and the world. This is precisely the influence that the Chinese regime wants to achieve in pushing forward its Belt and Road Initiative.

The Volvo Car Gent factory was praised by Xi Jinping in April 2014 as “a model of economic and technological cooperation between China, Belgium and Sweden.”

The Belgian auto industry that is seeking investment and business cooperation with China is by no means a model for anything. Instead, it is a role model that can be likened to the Chinese idiom: “pick a sesame seed only to lose a watermelon,” which means, concentrate on small gains at the expense of more important ones.

Many EU member states expressed that the BRI project runs counter to the EU’s free trade proposition because these Chinese companies are subsidized by the Chinese government. Therefore, they have unfair advantages in competition with European companies, and it is impossible to achieve a shared win-win situation with them.

Key Politicians Advocate Belt and Road Initiative

Kris Peeters, the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Economy and Employment of Belgium from 2014 to 2019, visited China many times. He stated on various occasions that Belgium is willing to team up with Beijing to contribute to the BRI.

On March 23, 2017, the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) approved 13 new members, including Belgium, bringing the total bank members to 70.

Peeters praised the move, saying: “We believe that the AIIB has the ambition to set the example for other development banks in China and abroad by adopting sound global standards with respect to economic viability, fiscal sustainability, climate and environment-friendliness and social sustainability.”

During an interview with Xinhua News Agency, Peeters hailed the BRI as “a grand vision.”

“In order to be successful, they must be developed together with all stakeholders, not only with national and regional governments and economic operators, but also with the local communities who will be most directly affected,” he said.

On March 27, 2018, when Peeters attended a ceremony at Volvo’s factory in Ghent, he praised China’s Geely brand in Belgium, and criticized the Trump administration for increasing tariffs on Chinese products as “unwise” trade protectionism.

Similarly, former Belgian Prime Minister Yves Letem is also an enthusiastic advocate of Belgium becoming a partner of China’s BRI.

In an exclusive interview with Chinese state media Southern Metropolis Daily on Oct. 27, 2019, Letem said Belgium is a gateway to the European market as well as a major logistic hub in Europe. Belgian ports offer excellent connections to all major European centers for consumption and production. He proposed the Belgian government to expedite the feasibility assessment of joining the BRI framework. He also revealed that Belgian leaders had already “put it on the agenda” and started discussions.

Peeters and Letem had made a number of appearances as supporters when the CCP promoted the BRI around the world, urging other EU member states to participate in the initiative. This is very rare among European leaders.

Assisting the CCP With Its Brainwashing

Beijing has opened six Confucius Institutes in Belgium so far. In addition, more than 50 schools in Belgium that offer Chinese language courses use textbooks provided by the CCP, which means, these are brainwashing materials compiled by the regime.

In recent years, the two countries have more than 100 cultural exchange programs in music, art, and cultural performances every year. The Brussels Chinese Cultural Center, founded in 2015, is an active participant.

In August 2017, China issued a “Belt and Road” commemorative stamp. A month later, the Confucius Institute at Leuven University in Belgium celebrated the “Global Confucius Institute Day” and to promote Sino-Belgian cultural exchanges.

Erik Famaey, treasurer of the Belgian-Chinese Economic and Commercial Council (BCECC), spoke at the exhibition, touting the BRI as a “historic project” that “benefits not only Asia but other regions of the world.” The BCECC, established in the 1980s, is the leading Belgian business association for companies engaged in doing business in or with China.

However, all China experts who have a deep understanding of the CCP know that the BRI is certainly not just an economic initiative or economic project. Beijing wants to extend its influence around the world by using its BRI to infiltrate other nations’ politics, diplomacy, military, defense, culture, and education. The primary tasks of the Chinese consulates and the Confucius Institutes in other countries are to seize all opportunities to promote the BRI and glamorize the “China story.”

According to an April 2 report from Xinhua News, Xi Jinping had a phone conversation with King Philippe, in which the Belgian king said that China takes the lead in putting the CCP virus outbreak under control, and its experience is of important value to other countries fighting the pandemic.

“Noting China has been supporting and contributing to other countries’ fight against the disease, King Philippe said Belgium appreciates China’s provision of emergency medical protective supplies, and is willing to collaborate with China on drug development,” Xinhua wrote.

Xinhua News Agency is the official mouthpiece of the CCP. It is difficult for the outside world to verify whether King Philippe actually made such statements. Those words seem to parrot the CCP ’s narrative. However, his close relationship with the CCP is evident.

Shortly after the phone conversation, Brussels Times reported that three million masks delivered to Belgium from China were rejected because they did not meet the quality standards.

A Xinhua report quoted Xi as saying that China would “tighten up quality control measures, and provide as many resources as it can for the global fight against the disease.” What an irony!

Xi’s promise and the poor quality masks sent to Belgium prove that the CCP is not trustworthy. Whoever believes in the CCP will invite big troubles.

In Belgium, both the royal family and the key politicians are advocating the BRI project. Its government was said to have placed the discussion of BRI cooperation high on the agenda.

Italy was the first G7 country to join BRI, despite opposition from other EU leaders. It is one of the countries hardest-hit by the global pandemic. More than 25,000 Italians have died from the CCP virus so far. The outbreak in Belgium is just as serious. It is a warning for Belgium: stay far away from the CCP.

Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.

Advertisements
Spread the love
Next PostRead more articles

Leave a Reply