Countering the Left’s Climate Power Grab With Facts

This post was originally published on this site

Subscribe, Like And Share!

Since publication of the last Mandate for Leadership, the Trump administration scrapped the climate agenda of the Obama administration, which would have driven up energy bills on American families for no meaningful impact on global temperature.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency replaced the Clean Power Plan with the Affordable Clean Energy Rule and revamped New Source Performance Standards to allow new coal-fired power plants to compete in the market, and the president has announced his intention to withdraw from the ineffective Paris climate accord.

The administration’s Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient Vehicles Rule modified Obama-era climate change regulations on cars and trucks.

The Interior Department revised methane regulations for oil and gas operations on federal lands, and ended the previous administration’s ban on coal leasing on public lands.

Through executive order, the administration disbanded the Interagency Working Group estimating the social cost of carbon and directed agencies to stop using the Obama-era cost estimate of more than $40 per ton of carbon dioxide. In its regulatory impact analysis of the Clean Power Plan, the Environmental Protection Agency lowered the social cost of carbon figure to between one dollar and six dollars for 2020.

The Council on Environmental Quality withdrew 2017 guidance on how federal agencies should consider climate change when complying with the National Environmental Policy Act and issued draft guidance that would prohibit federal agencies from giving stronger consideration to greenhouse gas emissions than other environmental impacts.

While the current administration has taken productive steps to reduce the previous administration’s regulatory climate tentacles, however, policymakers could do more.

The integrated assessment models are unreliable, and policymakers would be wise to prohibit their use. Withdrawing from the Paris climate accord was a bold step toward climate leadership because international climate efforts have been wasteful and unproductive. Recognizing this, the administration should withdraw from the entire United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.

The regulatory apparatus that looms largest in U.S. policy and continues to remain is the Environmental Protection Agency’s endangerment finding. This finding, which took effect in January 2010, gives the Environmental Protection Agency authority under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act to regulate greenhouse gases.

As long as the endangerment finding exists, future administrations will be able to implement more stringent climate regulations on American families and households. Revisiting the endangerment finding and creating a “Red Team/Blue Team” as proposed by Dr. Steven Koonin, undersecretary for Science in the U.S. Department of Energy during President Barack Obama’s first term, would be a productive step.

Inspired by the national security community’s Red Team exercise to challenge assumptions, reduce risks and uncertainties, and correct for biases, a Red Team/Blue Team would provide a public, transparent back-and-forth on major issues surrounding climate science.

Nicolas Loris, an economist, focuses on energy, environmental and regulatory issues as the Herbert and Joyce Morgan fellow at The Heritage Foundation.

This article is an excerpt from the “2020 Mandate for Leadership: A Clear Vision for the Next Administration.” It looks back at policy decisions made by the Trump administration over the past four years. You can purchase your copy of “Mandate 2020” here.

Editor’s Note: This piece originally appeared on The Daily Signal.


Subscribe, Like And Share!

Leave a Reply