David Morey, an informal political consultant for Joe Biden’s presidential campaign, tole Breitbart News he was “sympathetic” to Twitter and Facebook determining what information can and cannot be shared in the digital space. Morey joined Thursday’s edition of SiriusXM’s Breitbart News Tonight with host Joel Pollak to discuss the presidential race. Pollak asked about widespread news media avoidance of Hunter
A top official at one of Pennsylvania's most powerful labor groups slammed Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden for falsely boasting of the union's endorsement. Shawn Steffee, a trustee with Boilermakers Local 154, said that his members were shocked to hear the Democratic nominee claim their support on national television. While Biden claimed to have "sat down" with union leaders to
On Thursday night, 2020 Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden said during his ABC town hall that he is “open” to packing the Supreme Court with additional justices if he wins in November. Joe Biden now says “I’m open” to packing the Supreme Court. More proof that Joe is totally beholden to the radical left. #BidenTownHallpic.twitter.com/J1Ztdiz9TB — Ronna McDaniel (@GOPChairwoman) October 16, 2020 RELATED: Flashback: Biden Calls Supreme Court-Packing A ‘Bonehead Idea’ Biden On Packing The Supreme Court: ‘I Am Open’ ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos brought up the question. “I have not been a fan of court packing because I think it just generates what will happen for whoever wins; it just keeps moving in a way that is inconsistent with what is going to be manageable,” said Biden. Stephanopoulos replied, “So, you’re still not a fan?” Biden went on, referencing the ongoing confirmation of Supreme Court Justice nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett, “Well, I’m not a fan, it depends on how this turns out, not how he wins, but how it’s handled,” Biden said. Support Conservative Voices! Sign up to receive the latest political news, insight, and commentary delivered directly to your inbox. “So, if they vote on it before the election?” Stephanopoulos asked Biden. “I am open to considering what happens from that point on,” Biden replied. He did not elaborate on what he means by ‘how’ the Senate confirmation proceedings are ‘handled.’ Biden’s “openness” to packing the Supreme Court he expressed on Thursday night seems to contradict what he said in 2005, when he described court packing as a power grab. If we don’t win, the Radical Left will destroy our Country. Biden refuses to answer questions on packing the SCOTUS! Dems will pack the Court w/ radical left justices who will shred the #2A, empower violent mobs, and protect terrorists & violent criminals! pic.twitter.com/qUrjRM6MTp — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 15, 2020 Biden Used To Oppose The Idea Of Court Packing Describing the infamous attempt by FDR to pack the court over the court’s objections to his unconstitutional New Deal programs, Biden took a very strong stance against court packing. Biden in 2005: “In this environment, Roosevelt — I remember this old adage about power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely — corrupted by power, in my view, unveiled his court-packing plan. He wanted to increase the number of justices to 15, allowing himself to nominate those additional judges. It took an act of courage on the part of his own party institutionally to stand up against this power grab.” Biden also called court packing a “bonehead” idea in 1983 during the Reagan administration. Biden Flip Flops On Whether Voters ‘Deserve’ To Know His Stance Biden also now claims that he would actually give voters his stance on court packing before the election. This in stark contrast to Biden’s comments earlier this month. Previously, Biden said voters didn’t need to know his stance on court packing and would learn after the election, should he win in November. After @KamalaHarris refused to answer if a Biden-Harris Administration would pack the Supreme Court, @JoeBiden refused to answer again on Thursday in Phoenix. Biden said, "they'll know my opinion on court packing when the election is over." More info: https://t.co/2mRObw0YcR pic.twitter.com/SyG9xDEug1 — KUSI News (@KUSINews) October 8, 2020 RELATED: Biden Refuses To Reveal His Stance On Packing Supreme Court Until After Election “You’ll know my opinion on court packing when the election is over,” Biden told reporters, according to the New York Post.” In another strange interview, Biden said voters didn’t deserve to know his stance on court packing. 👀 Joe Biden tells a reporter American voters “don’t deserve” to know his position on packing the Supreme Court. pic.twitter.com/rEmv2Q08JT — Trump War Room – Text TRUMP to 88022 (@TrumpWarRoom) October 10, 2020 Last night, Biden said that he would, in fact, tell voters his stance on court packing before the election. Biden said, “They do have a right to know where I’ll stand and they’ll have a right to know where I stand before they vote.”
It is like expecting a unicorn pony on your sixth birthday (I’m still brooding over it) to expect ABC to honestly set up a town hall event. They did not disappoint those low expectations on Thursday night at an event in Philadelphia. Two of the questioners, just regular citizens mind you, were falsely identified without mentioning their activism, if you can call championing corruption and socialism “activism,” for the Democrat Party. And there was also this. A committed Joe Biden supporter who was wrongly presented by @NBCNews as undecided said he was clear with the network about his intention to vote Democrat before the town hall.Via @DavidRutz https://t.co/lcw7CUdlIn — Free Beacon (@FreeBeacon) October 15, 2020 Obama Speechwriter Asks Biden Question Fox News picks up the shill story, “One of the questioners at the ABC-hosted event was Nathan Osburn, a former speechwriter for the Obama White House. Osburn specifically worked for the Office of Public Affairs at the Commerce Department under the Obama-Biden administration and at the Small Business Administration… Osburn was quoted in the Philadelphia Inquirer earlier this year as ‘a former Obama administration speechwriter’ who had created a ‘Philly for Pete group’ aimed at boosting former Democratic presidential primary candidate Pete Buttigieg. And the LGBTQ Victory Institute listed Osburn as a senior speechwriter for the Small Business Administration in an article praising the Obama-Biden administration for its LGBTQ hiring practices.” Yeah, just an average Joe. Here’s the completely objective question he asked. “Amy Coney Barrett’s being pushed through at the last minute, even though millions have already voted. So what do you think about ideas from people like Pete Buttigieg and others to put in place safeguards that will help ensure more long-term balance and stability? And what do you say to LGBTQ Americans and others who are very worried right now about erosions of their rights and our democracy as a whole?” Support Conservative Voices! Sign up to receive the latest political news, insight, and commentary delivered directly to your inbox. Interesting. You’d think democracy would be eroded by lying to the American people as to the identity of a questioner at a presidential campaign town hall. He was just listed as a communications worker by ABC. Not to mention that George Stephanopoulos, a former high ranking Clinton administration figure, was the debate moderator. RELATED: Town Hall Voter Jabs Biden: What Do You Have to Say To Black Voters Besides ‘You Ain’t Black?’ Another Question Asked By Someone With Democrat Political Ties Another set up concerned one Mieke Haeck, who ABC described as a physical therapist from State College, PA. FNC: “Haeck is also the wife of Ezra Nanes, a high-profile Democrat in Pennsylvania who in 2018 ran a campaign challenging Republican state Senate Majority Leader Jake Corman. Nanes is currently an at-large member of the Centre County Democratic Committee. Centre County is the county in which State College resides.” Here is her unbiased question” “My youngest daughter is transgender. The Trump administration has attacked the rights of transgender people, banning them from military service, weakening nondiscrimination protections and even removing the word ‘transgender’ from some government websites. How will you as president reverse this dangerous and discriminatory agenda and ensure that the lives and rights of LGBTQ people are protected under U.S. law?” Poor ABC. They can’t even run their shills without it being thrown back in their face. If they thought Biden was ahead they wouldn’t resort to this. Are they getting nervous? READ NEXT: Joe Biden Admits He’s ‘Open’ To Packing Supreme Court Depending On ACB Confirmation This piece was written by David Kamioner on October 16, 2020. It originally appeared in LifeZette and is used by permission. Read more at LifeZette:Barrett Shines In Final Day of Questioning Before The SenateMost Americans Blame Nancy Pelosi For Failure To Pass Stimulus, New Poll ShowsParalyzed GOP Candidate’s Home Is Vandalized After His Opponent Advocates Violence – ‘No Surprise’ The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content partners are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Political Insider.
Joe Biden came into Thursday night’s town hall, which was originally supposed to be a debate, stung by new allegations of influence-peddling involving his son Hunter. The question on everyone’s mind going in was whether he would be allowed to answer any question harder than chocolate or tapioca? With social media strangling the Hunter story from the New York Post,
Thursday evening was never going to be a fair night for President Donald Trump no matter what. First, the incumbent Republican president was supposed to participate in a traditional town hall debate with former Vice President Joe Biden moderated by C-SPAN’s Steve Scully, a former intern for the Democratic candidate. Then, Scully publicly consulted fired anti-Trump Communications Director Anthony Scaramucci